{"id":436,"date":"2022-01-11T13:17:31","date_gmt":"2022-01-11T13:17:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/?page_id=436"},"modified":"2022-06-11T09:05:59","modified_gmt":"2022-06-11T09:05:59","slug":"call-volume-9-n-1-2022","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/call-volume-9-n-1-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"Call Volume 9, n. 1, 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"

Tra etica e semiotica. <\/strong>Segni e natura nell\u2019era dell\u2019Antropocene<\/strong><\/h3>\n

 <\/p>\n

Editors:<\/p>\n

Valeria Dattilo<\/em> (Dipartimento di Architettura, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara);<\/p>\n

Francesco De Pascale<\/em> (Dipartimento di Culture e Societ\u00e0, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Palermo);<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Scadenza presentazione contributi:<\/em> 30 giugno 2022;<\/p>\n

Notifica approvazione contributi:<\/em> 10 luglio 2022;<\/p>\n

Pubblicazione:<\/em> 30 luglio 2022;<\/p>\n

I contributi dovranno essere inviati all\u2019indirizzo e-mail\u00a0filosofiesemiotiche.ilsileno@gmail.com.<\/b><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

L\u2019Antropocene, a differenza delle altre epoche precedenti, \u00e8 comunemente riconosciuta come l\u2019era in cui l\u2019impatto degli esseri umani \u00e8 pi\u00f9 incisivo nel determinare le dinamiche del clima e del pianeta in cui viviamo. Il premio Nobel per la chimica Paul Crutzen (2005) ha sostenuto, per esempio, che, da un punto di vista geologico, l\u2019era in cui viviamo presenta modificazioni legate all\u2019azione umana in grado di permanere per milioni di anni, dando un\u2019impronta irreversibile alle trasformazioni dell\u2019ambiente terrestre. Il dibattito sul concetto di Antropocene, negli ultimi anni, ha subito una battuta d\u2019arresto nelle scienze geologiche per i limiti stratigrafici e temporali imposti all\u2019interno delle discipline e per l\u2019individuazione dei cosiddetti \u201cmarcatori geologici\u201d ed \u00e8 divenuto, invece, sempre pi\u00f9 vivo nelle scienze umane e sociali e nelle Environmental Humanities, coinvolgendo anche geografi, filosofi, antropologi e sociologi.<\/p>\n

La stessa espressione \u201cera dell\u2019Antropocene\u201d \u00e8 stata ripresa dal filosofo francese Michel Serres (2009), per ripensare il rapporto esseri umani-natura, intendendo per natura non solo oggetto, spazio da dominare e manipolare, ma \u201csoggetto di diritto\u201d, come afferma nella sua opera, Le contrat naturel<\/em> (1990): \u201ctanto la natura d\u00e0 all\u2019uomo, tanto il secondo deve rendere alla prima, diventa soggetto di diritto\u201d (Serres, 1990, p. 18). Serres ha dato, inoltre, un importante contributo, al dibattito tra etica e Antropocene.<\/p>\n

Il carattere espressamente interdisciplinare che caratterizza il dibattito contemporaneo sull\u2019Antropocene ci porta, dunque, ad affrontare questo tema verso un dialogo proficuo fra la visione filosofica e quella scientifica, senza che le due visioni si annullino a vicenda.<\/p>\n

Ed \u00e8 con questo spirito che guardiamo a questa Call.<\/p>\n

Oltre ai numerosi tentativi di fornire una lettura naturalistica, filosofica, sociologica del problema, con questa Call proponiamo una lettura semiotica del problema con un imprescindibile riferimento alla natura umana, oltre che alla natura in generale.<\/p>\n

Questa caratterizzazione del problema \u00e8 solo apparentemente ossimorica, ma in realt\u00e0 ha come obiettivo quello di evitare qualsiasi tipo di riduzionismo, come quello di antropizzare la natura.<\/p>\n

Con la presente Call intendiamo, dunque, evidenziare alcuni aspetti dell\u2019Antropocene al fine di suggerire un ripensamento del rapporto tra natura umana e ambiente circostante; ci\u00f2 permetter\u00e0 di specificare come l\u2019etica e la semiotica possano essere impiegate in un lavoro di ripensamento di queste due categorie, e, in generale, del legame tra linguaggio e natura, che comporta inevitabilmente la necessit\u00e0 di rivedere i nostri modi di \u201cfare mondo\u201d.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Bibliografia di riferimento<\/strong><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Crutzen, P.J., (2005), Benvenuti nell\u2019Antropocene!,<\/em> Mondadori, Milano.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2015), La semiosi dell\u2019Antropocene. Riflessioni tra geoetica e semiotica a partire dal triangolo di Peirce<\/em>, Filosofi(e)Semiotiche, 2, 1, pp. 90-98.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2019), La s\u00e9miosis de l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne: pour une r\u00e9interpr\u00e9tation de la relation entre l\u2019homme et la nature par le biais de la g\u00e9o\u00e9thique<\/em>, Rivista Geografica Italiana, 2, 23-40.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2021), The Geoethical Semiosis of the Anthropocene: The Peircean Triad for a Reconceptualization of the Relationship between Human Beings and Environment<\/em>, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111, 3, 647-654. DOI: 10.1080\/24694452.2020.1843994;<\/p>\n

Eco, U., (1987), Trattato di Semiotica Generale<\/em>, Bompiani, Milano.<\/p>\n

Farinelli, F., (2004), Geografia. Un\u2019introduzione ai modelli del mondo<\/em>, Einaudi, Torino.<\/p>\n

Latour, B., (2015), Face \u00e0 Ga\u00efa. Huit conf\u00e9rences sur le nouveau r\u00e9gime climatique<\/em>, La Decouverte, Paris.<\/p>\n

Peirce, C.S., (1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce<\/em>, vols. 1\u20136, 1931\u20131935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., vols. 7\u20138, Arthur W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.<\/p>\n

Peirce, C.S., (1903), The Ethics of Terminology<\/em>, Einaudi, Torino, pp. 113-119.<\/p>\n

Serres, M., (1990), Le Contrat naturel<\/em>, Fran\u00e7ois Bourin, Paris.<\/p>\n

Serres, M., (2009), Temps des crises<\/em>, Le Pommier, Paris.<\/p>\n

Travis, C., Valentino, V., (2021) (Eds.), Narratives in the Anthropocene era<\/em>, Geographies of the Anthropocene, Il Sileno Edizioni, Lago.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Between ethics and semiotics. <\/strong>Signs and nature in the Anthropocene era<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Editors:<\/i><\/em><\/p>\n

Valeria Dattilo<\/em> (Department of Architecture, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara);<\/p>\n

Francesco De Pascale<\/em> (Department of Culture and Society, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Palermo);<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Submission Deadline:<\/em> 30 June 2022;<\/p>\n

Notification of Acceptance:<\/em> 10 July 2022;<\/p>\n

Publication Date:<\/em> 30 July 2022;<\/p>\n

Contributions must be sent to the e-mail address filosofiesemiotiche.ilsileno@gmail.com.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The Anthropocene, unlike other previous eras, is commonly recognized as the era in which the impact of human beings is most incisive in determining the dynamics of the climate and the planet in which we live. The Nobel Prize in Chemistry Paul Crutzen (2005) argued, for example, that, from a geological point of view, the era in which we live presents modifications linked to human action capable of lasting for millions of years, giving a irreversible imprint on the transformations of the terrestrial environment. The debate on the concept of Anthropocene, in recent years has suffered a setback in the geological sciences due to the stratigraphic and temporal limits imposed within the disciplines and for the identification of the so-called “geological markers” and has become, instead, always more alive in the human and social sciences and in the Environmental Humanities, also involving geographers, philosophers, anthropologists and sociologists.<\/p>\n

The same expression \u201cera of the Anthropocene\u201d was taken up by the French philosopher Michel Serres (2009), to rethink the relationship between human beings and nature, meaning by nature not only an object, a space to be dominated and manipulated, but a \u201csubject of law\u201d, as he states in his masterpiece, Le contrat naturel<\/em> (1990): \u00abmuch nature gives man, man must give that much back to nature, now a legal subject\u00bb (Serres, 1990, p. 18). Serres also made an important contribution to the debate between ethics and the Anthropocene.<\/p>\n

The expressly interdisciplinary approach that characterizes the contemporary debate on the Anthropocene, leads us, therefore, to address this issue towards a fruitful dialogue between the philosophical and the scientific views, without the two visions canceling each other out.<\/p>\n

And it is with this spirit that we present this Call.<\/p>\n

In addition to the numerous attempts to provide a naturalistic, philosophical, sociological reading of the issue, with this Call we propose a semiotic reading of the question with an essential reference to human nature, as well as to nature in general.<\/p>\n

This characterization of the problem is only apparently oxymorical, but in reality it aims to avoid any kind of reductionism, such as that of anthropizing nature.<\/p>\n

With this Call we intend, therefore, to highlight some aspects of the Anthropocene in order to suggest a rethinking of the relationship between human nature and the surrounding environment; this will allow us to specify how ethics and semiotics can be used in a rethinking of these two categories, and, in general, of the link between language and nature, which inevitably involves the need to review our ways of “making world”.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

References<\/strong><\/p>\n

Crutzen, P.J., (2005), Benvenuti nell\u2019Antropocene!,<\/em> Mondadori, Milano.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2015), La semiosi dell\u2019Antropocene. Riflessioni tra geoetica e semiotica a partire dal triangolo di Peirce<\/em>, Filosofi(e)Semiotiche, 2, 1, pp. 90-98.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2019), La s\u00e9miosis de l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne: pour une r\u00e9interpr\u00e9tation de la relation entre l\u2019homme et la nature par le biais de la g\u00e9o\u00e9thique<\/em>, Rivista Geografica Italiana, 2, 23-40.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2021), The Geoethical Semiosis of the Anthropocene: The Peircean Triad for a Reconceptualization of the Relationship between Human Beings and Environment<\/em>, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111, 3, 647-654. DOI: 10.1080\/24694452.2020.1843994;<\/p>\n

Eco, U., (1987), Trattato di Semiotica Generale<\/em>, Bompiani, Milano.<\/p>\n

Farinelli, F., (2004), Geografia. Un\u2019introduzione ai modelli del mondo<\/em>, Einaudi, Torino.<\/p>\n

Latour, B., (2015), Face \u00e0 Ga\u00efa. Huit conf\u00e9rences sur le nouveau r\u00e9gime climatique<\/em>, La Decouverte, Paris.<\/p>\n

Peirce, C.S., (1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce<\/em>, vols. 1\u20136, 1931\u20131935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., vols. 7\u20138, Arthur W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.<\/p>\n

Peirce, C.S., (1903), The Ethics of Terminology<\/em>, Einaudi, Torino, pp. 113-119.<\/p>\n

Serres, M., (1990), Le Contrat naturel<\/em>, Fran\u00e7ois Bourin, Paris.<\/p>\n

Serres, M., (2009), Temps des crises<\/em>, Le Pommier, Paris.<\/p>\n

Travis, C., Valentino, V., (2021) (Eds.), Narratives in the Anthropocene era<\/em>, Geographies of the Anthropocene, Il Sileno Edizioni, Lago.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Entre \u00e9thique et s\u00e9miotique. <\/strong>Signes et nature \u00e0 l\u2019\u00e8re de l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne<\/strong><\/p>\n

Dirig\u00e9 par :<\/p>\n

Valeria Dattilo<\/em> (D\u00e9partement d’Architecture, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara);<\/p>\n

Francesco De Pascale<\/em> (D\u00e9partement de Cultures et Soci\u00e9t\u00e9, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Palermo);<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Date limite de soumission des contributions : 30 Juin 2022 ;<\/p>\n

Notification de l’approbation de la contribution : 10 Juillet 2022 ;<\/p>\n

Publication : 30 Juillet 2022\u00a0 ;<\/p>\n

Les contributions doivent \u00eatre envoy\u00e9es \u00e0 l’adresse \u00e9lectronique filosofiesemiotiche.ilsileno@gmail.com.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

L\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne, contrairement \u00e0 d\u2019autres \u00e9poques pr\u00e9c\u00e9dentes, est commun\u00e9ment reconnu comme l\u2019\u00e8re o\u00f9 l\u2019impact des \u00eatres humains est le plus incisif pour d\u00e9terminer la dynamique du climat et de la plan\u00e8te dans laquelle nous vivons. Le prix Nobel de chimie Paul Crutzen (2005) soutenait par exemple que, d\u2019un point de vue g\u00e9ologique, l\u2019\u00e8re dans laquelle nous vivons pr\u00e9sente des modifications li\u00e9es \u00e0 l\u2019action humaine pouvant durer des millions d\u2019ann\u00e9es, laissant une empreinte irr\u00e9versible sur les transformations du milieu terrestre. Le d\u00e9bat sur le concept d\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne, ces derni\u00e8res ann\u00e9es a subi un revers dans les sciences g\u00e9ologiques en raison des limites stratigraphiques et temporelles impos\u00e9es au sein des disciplines et pour l\u2019identification des soi-disant “marqueurs g\u00e9ologiques” et est devenu, au contraire, toujours plus vivant dans les sciences humaines et sociales et dans les Humanit\u00e9s de l\u2019Environnement, impliquant \u00e9galement g\u00e9ographes, philosophes, anthropologues et sociologues.<\/p>\n

La m\u00eame expression \u00ab \u00e8re de l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne \u00bb a \u00e9t\u00e9 reprise par le philosophe fran\u00e7ais Michel Serres (2009), pour repenser la relation entre l\u2019homme et la nature, signifiant par nature non seulement un objet, un espace \u00e0 dominer et \u00e0 manipuler, mais un \u00ab sujet de droit \u00bb, comme il l\u2019\u00e9nonce dans son chef-d\u2019\u0153uvre, Le contrat naturel (1990) : \u00ab autant la nature donne \u00e0 l\u2019homme, autant celui-ci doit rendre \u00e0 celle-l\u00e0, devenue sujet de droit \u00bb (Serres, 1990, p. 18). Serres a \u00e9galement apport\u00e9 une contribution importante au d\u00e9bat entre l\u2019\u00e9thique et l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne.<\/p>\n

Le caract\u00e8re express\u00e9ment interdisciplinaire qui caract\u00e9rise le d\u00e9bat contemporain sur l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne nous conduit donc \u00e0 aborder cette question vers un dialogue f\u00e9cond entre les visions philosophique et scientifique, sans que les deux visions ne s\u2019annulent.<\/p>\n

Et c\u2019est avec cet esprit que nous regardons cet Appel.<\/p>\n

En plus des nombreuses tentatives pour fournir une lecture naturaliste, philosophique, sociologique du probl\u00e8me, nous proposons avec cet Appel une lecture s\u00e9miotique du probl\u00e8me avec une r\u00e9f\u00e9rence essentielle \u00e0 la nature humaine, ainsi qu\u2019\u00e0 la nature en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral.<\/p>\n

Cette caract\u00e9risation du probl\u00e8me n\u2019est qu\u2019apparemment oxymorique, mais en r\u00e9alit\u00e9 elle vise \u00e0 \u00e9viter toute forme de r\u00e9ductionnisme, comme celui de la nature anthropisante.<\/p>\n

Avec cet Appel, nous entendons donc surligner quelques aspects de l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne afin de proposer une refonte de la relation entre la nature humaine et l\u2019environnement qui l\u2019entoure ; cela nous permettra de pr\u00e9ciser comment l\u2019\u00e9thique et la s\u00e9miotique peuvent \u00eatre utilis\u00e9es pour repenser ces deux cat\u00e9gories, et, en g\u00e9n\u00e9ral, le lien entre langage et nature, ce qui implique in\u00e9vitablement la n\u00e9cessit\u00e9 de revoir nos mani\u00e8res de \u00ab faire monde \u00bb.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

Bibliographie de r\u00e9f\u00e9rence<\/strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Crutzen, P.J., (2005), Benvenuti nell\u2019Antropocene!,<\/em> Mondadori, Milano.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2015), La semiosi dell\u2019Antropocene. Riflessioni tra geoetica e semiotica a partire dal triangolo di Peirce<\/em>, Filosofi(e)Semiotiche, 2, 1, pp. 90-98.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2019), La s\u00e9miosis de l\u2019Anthropoc\u00e8ne: pour une r\u00e9interpr\u00e9tation de la relation entre l\u2019homme et la nature par le biais de la g\u00e9o\u00e9thique<\/em>, Rivista Geografica Italiana, 2, 23-40.<\/p>\n

De Pascale, F., Dattilo, V. (2021), The Geoethical Semiosis of the Anthropocene: The Peircean Triad for a Reconceptualization of the Relationship between Human Beings and Environment<\/em>, Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111, 3, 647-654. DOI: 10.1080\/24694452.2020.1843994;<\/p>\n

Eco, U., (1987), Trattato di Semiotica Generale<\/em>, Bompiani, Milano.<\/p>\n

Farinelli, F., (2004), Geografia. Un\u2019introduzione ai modelli del mondo<\/em>, Einaudi, Torino.<\/p>\n

Latour, B., (2015), Face \u00e0 Ga\u00efa. Huit conf\u00e9rences sur le nouveau r\u00e9gime climatique<\/em>, La Decouverte, Paris.<\/p>\n

Peirce, C.S., (1958), Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce<\/em>, vols. 1\u20136, 1931\u20131935, Charles Hartshorne and Paul Weiss, eds., vols. 7\u20138, Arthur W. Burks, ed., Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.<\/p>\n

Peirce, C.S., (1903), The Ethics of Terminology<\/em>, Einaudi, Torino, pp. 113-119.<\/p>\n

Serres, M., (1990), Le Contrat naturel<\/em>, Fran\u00e7ois Bourin, Paris.<\/p>\n

Serres, M., (2009), Temps des crises<\/em>, Le Pommier, Paris.<\/p>\n

Travis, C., Valentino, V. (2021) (Eds.), Narratives in the Anthropocene era<\/em>, Geographies of the Anthropocene, Il Sileno Edizioni, Lago.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Tra etica e semiotica. Segni e natura nell\u2019era dell\u2019Antropocene   Editors: Valeria Dattilo (Dipartimento di Architettura, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi “G. d’Annunzio” Chieti-Pescara); Francesco De Pascale (Dipartimento di Culture e Societ\u00e0, Universit\u00e0 degli Studi di Palermo);   Scadenza presentazione contributi: 30 giugno 2022; Notifica approvazione contributi: 10 luglio 2022; Pubblicazione: 30… Continue reading<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/436"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=436"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/436\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":449,"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/436\/revisions\/449"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.ilsileno.it\/filosofiesemiotiche\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=436"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}